About that music
Feb. 26th, 2006 11:47 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So last night I posted some music. If you want to try to figure out what it is, read that post, not this one.
Every natural number greater than 1 can be expressed as a unique set of prime factors.
5: 5.
6: 2 3.
672: 2 2 2 2 2 3 7.
If you assign each prime a note, going up the chromatic scale, and for each number, play its prime factorization in ascending sequence within a single beat, the clips I posted are 2-97 and 300-397.
I had this idea 3 years ago or so, and have just now gotten it working with some help from
rikchik and some folks from the secret project down the way. It's a neat sound, though I feel like there's more to do with it. It might be interesting to do something different with the primes, to emphasize the lyrical quality of the composites. I'll need to think about that, but I'd be very interested in suggestions.
Here's the sequence from 2 to 397.
Every natural number greater than 1 can be expressed as a unique set of prime factors.
5: 5.
6: 2 3.
672: 2 2 2 2 2 3 7.
If you assign each prime a note, going up the chromatic scale, and for each number, play its prime factorization in ascending sequence within a single beat, the clips I posted are 2-97 and 300-397.
I had this idea 3 years ago or so, and have just now gotten it working with some help from
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Here's the sequence from 2 to 397.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-26 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-27 12:07 am (UTC)Some modern music shares some elements with your sequence, but by itself this comes off as more the basis for a piece of music than something finished.
Have you considered chords instead of individual notes? For 6, rather than playing the pitches for 2 and 3 sequentially, you could play them both at the same time.
Scatterbrained reply:
Date: 2006-02-27 12:21 am (UTC)Here's two experiments:
Primes as rests and
Primes skipped altogether.
What do you think of making 2 the highest note and going down for successive primes?
I do like the idea of chords, but I'm not sure where to get other values. Though I could do something specific for the first few factors. Hmm...
Re: Scatterbrained reply:
Date: 2006-02-27 05:23 am (UTC)Also, just going diatonic (white key only) instead of chromatic would significantly reduce the crunchiness of the chords.
One thing I like about starting at the bottom and going up is the constant repetition of 2 gives it a home pitch to keep returning to. I'm not sure starting high and descending would give that same sense of a home pitch, especially if your starting pitch is too high and squeaky.
If you want to be really crazy you can try randomly assigning pitches. Say, the first twelve primes are randomly assigned to the twelve notes in one octave. If you want some logic to it you can use the same sequence of pitches an octave up for the next twelve pitches, or you could choose a new ordering, selected randomly or based on a transformation of the initial sequence. Or you could just randomly assign the 88 keys on the piano to the first 88 primes and end up with a pointilist splatter of pitches.
I am far from an expert on 12-tone music, but there are some compositional techniques that you could experiment with.
I find myself thinking about ways to generate rhythm and dynamics, but they all require introducing additional sequences of numbers, and I don't know if that's a step you want to take.
Re: Scatterbrained reply:
Date: 2006-02-27 03:01 pm (UTC)Re: Scatterbrained reply:
Date: 2007-05-07 12:50 pm (UTC)max
Date: 2006-03-02 03:49 pm (UTC)It's a good environment for such experiences.
greetings:
erno"